Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Effect of lesion proximity on the regenerative response of long descending propriospinal neurons after spinal transection injury

Effect of lesion proximity on the regenerative response of long descending propriospinal neurons after spinal transection injury

BMC Neuroscience, 2019 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-019-0491-y · Published: March 5, 2019

Spinal Cord InjuryRegenerative MedicineNeurology

Simple Explanation

The spinal cord has a limited ability to repair itself after injury. However, propriospinal (PS) neurons have shown some capacity for axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury, regrowing and re-establishing connections across a spinal lesion. This study examines how the distance of the injury from the cell body of long descending propriospinal tract (LDPT) neurons affects their molecular response to injury, comparing it to the response of short thoracic propriospinal (TPS) neurons. The location of axonal injury relative to the neuron's cell body significantly impacts its regenerative response. The study suggests inherent differences between LDPT and TPS neurons affect their response to axotomy, implying different therapies may be needed to maximize regeneration of all PS axons after spinal cord injury.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
30 Female Fischer rats
Evidence Level
Level III, experimental study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Axonal injury closer to LDPT neuron cell bodies resulted in a different gene expression response compared to injury further away. This response was less robust than that observed in TPS neurons after proximal axotomy.
  • 2
    The location of axotomy relative to the neuronal cell body is an important determinant for changes elicited in gene expression.
  • 3
    Phenotypic differences exist between TPS and LDPT neurons. There are significant differences in baseline expression between the LDPT and TPS neurons

Research Summary

This study investigates the effect of lesion proximity on the regenerative response of long descending propriospinal (LDPT) neurons after spinal transection injury, comparing their response to that of short thoracic propriospinal (TPS) neurons. The results demonstrate that the location of axotomy significantly affects the post-injury response of LDPT neurons, with proximal axotomy leading to a more dynamic but less robust response compared to distal axotomy. The study also provides further evidence of phenotypic differences between LDPT and TPS neurons, suggesting that propriospinal neurons are not a homogenous population.

Practical Implications

Therapeutic Targeting

Identifies potential gene targets for therapies aimed at promoting regeneration after spinal cord injury.

Personalized Treatment

Suggests that different or multiple therapies may be needed to stimulate maximal regeneration of all propriospinal axons, recognizing the differences between neuronal populations.

Understanding Recovery

Provides insights into why thoracic propriospinal neurons are involved in recovery of function even with the failure of supraspinal axon regeneration.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The study is limited to a specific set of genes, potentially missing other important factors.
  • 2
    The study uses a rat model, which may not fully translate to human spinal cord injury.
  • 3
    The role of inflammation was not fully characterized, requiring further studies.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury