Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Creating and confirming observable professional activities (OPAs): A brief report on the practical approach for OPA design for resident education

Creating and confirming observable professional activities (OPAs): A brief report on the practical approach for OPA design for resident education

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2023 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2191100 · Published: May 1, 2023

Spinal Cord InjuryEducation

Simple Explanation

The study addresses the need for effective evaluation tools in competency-based medical education, focusing on Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) and Observable Practice Activities (OPAs). EPAs translate competencies into evaluable units, while OPAs are discrete tasks that contribute to assessing an EPA. The authors created 10 OPAs for the Spinal Cord Injury EPA and achieved consensus among experts in the field through a modified Delphi method. This involved multiple rounds of evaluation and refinement to ensure the OPAs were relevant and practical for assessing resident competency. The goal is to provide residents with targeted feedback on their progress toward independent practice in caring for patients with spinal cord injuries. Future research should assess the feasibility and utility of implementing these OPAs in real-world clinical settings.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Seven board certified spinal cord injury medicine physicians
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The study successfully developed 10 OPAs for evaluating resident competency in caring for patients with spinal cord injury. These OPAs address a gap in non-procedural PM&R rotations, where evaluation tools are lacking.
  • 2
    Expert consensus was achieved through a modified Delphi method, with significant differences observed between the first and second rounds of evaluation. This indicates that the OPAs were refined and improved based on expert feedback.
  • 3
    The final list of OPAs provides a structured framework for assessing various aspects of spinal cord injury management, including history and physical exam, ISNCSCI examination, and management of neurogenic bladder and bowel.

Research Summary

This study addresses the need for standardized assessment tools in physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residency programs, particularly for non-procedural rotations like spinal cord injury (SCI). The authors developed ten observable practice activities (OPAs) designed to evaluate resident competency in managing patients with SCI. A modified Delphi panel of seven experts was used to achieve consensus on the content of the OPAs. The experts evaluated and provided feedback on the OPAs in two rounds, with modifications made based on their input. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between the two rounds, indicating improved consensus. The resulting OPAs cover key areas of SCI management and are intended to provide targeted feedback to residents, helping them progress towards independent practice. Future research will focus on assessing the feasibility and utility of these OPAs in clinical settings.

Practical Implications

Targeted Feedback

The developed OPAs can provide targeted feedback to residents on their competency in caring for patients with spinal cord injury.

Standardized Evaluation

Successful implementation of these OPAs would standardize how PM&R programs evaluate residents across the country.

Future Research

Future studies should evaluate the utility of this tool to determine if teachers and learners benefit from this tool and if it enhances SCI education.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The number of experts polled in the development of the OPAs could have been larger.
  • 2
    The OPAs could potentially be broken down even further, which presents a trade-off between precise evaluation and faculty workload.
  • 3
    The utility of this tool in practice is currently unproven and requires further assessment in clinical settings.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury