Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Critical Care
  4. Cough augmentation techniques for extubation or weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation (Review)

Cough augmentation techniques for extubation or weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation (Review)

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017 · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011833.pub2 · Published: January 3, 2019

Critical CarePulmonology

Simple Explanation

Critically-ill adults and children who need assistance from machines (ventilators) to help them breathe may have difficulty coughing and clearing secretions. Techniques such as building up the volume of air in the lungs over a number of breaths (breathstacking), manually- and mechanically-assisted cough with an insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) device can be used to encourage people to cough. Very low-quality evidence from single trial findings suggests that cough-promoting techniques might increase successful removal of the breathing tube and decrease the time spent on mechanical ventilation, while not causing harm.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
95 adults and 17 children
Evidence Level
Systematic Review

Key Findings

  • 1
    One trial of 75 participants reported that extubation success (defined as no need for reintubation within 48 hours) was higher in the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) group (82.9% versus 52.5%, P < 0.05)
  • 2
    One trial reported a statistically significant reduction in mechanical ventilation duration favouring MI-E (mean difference -6.1 days, 95% CI -8.4 to -3.8, very low-quality evidence).
  • 3
    Adverse events (reported by two trials) included one participant receiving the MI-E protocol experiencing haemodynamic compromise.

Research Summary

We screened 2686 citations and included two trials enrolling 95 participants and one cohort study enrolling 17 participants. One trial reported a statistically significant reduction in mechanical ventilation duration favouring MI-E (mean difference -6.1 days, 95% CI -8.4 to -3.8, very low-quality evidence). The overall quality of evidence on the efficacy of cough augmentation techniques for critically-ill people is very low.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

Cough augmentation techniques might improve extubation success and decrease the duration of mechanical ventilation while not increasing harm.

Further Research Needed

Studies are required to determine which type of critically-ill people may benefit or be at risk of harm from cough augmentation techniques.

Research Methodology

Adequately-powered, multicentre randomized controlled trials are needed comparing cough augmentation techniques to weaning and extubation practices that do not include cough augmentation techniques.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small number of trials with few participants
  • 2
    Unclear risk of bias
  • 3
    Most outcomes of interest reported in a single study

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Critical Care