Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Comparing 4- and 6-week post-flap protocols in patients with spinal cord injury

Comparing 4- and 6-week post-flap protocols in patients with spinal cord injury

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2021 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1703501 · Published: January 1, 2021

Spinal Cord InjurySurgeryDermatology

Simple Explanation

The study compares two different durations of post-operative bedrest for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) who have undergone flap surgery to treat pressure injuries (PIs). The aim was to determine if a 6-week bedrest protocol leads to better outcomes compared to a 4-week protocol. Researchers reviewed patient data from 1997 to 2016 at a VA hospital, comparing those treated under a 4-week bedrest protocol to those treated under a 6-week protocol after flap surgery for pressure injuries. The primary outcome was the time until patients could sit for 2 hours without issues. The study found that the 4-week protocol was associated with a significantly shorter time to remobilization to sitting for 2 hours, and a shorter length of stay, without an increase in complications like wound dehiscence or surgical revisions.

Study Duration
1997 to 2016
Participants
190 patients with spinal cord injury
Evidence Level
Retrospective review

Key Findings

  • 1
    Patients in the 4-week protocol group achieved 2-hour sitting an average of 6 days sooner than those in the 6-week protocol group.
  • 2
    The 4-week protocol resulted in a shorter length of stay in the hospital compared to the 6-week protocol.
  • 3
    There were no significant differences in rates of dehiscence or revision surgery between the 4-week and 6-week protocols.

Research Summary

This retrospective study compared the outcomes of 4-week and 6-week post-flap bedrest protocols for patients with SCI undergoing flap surgery for PIs. The study found that the 4-week protocol resulted in a significantly shorter time to remobilization to sitting and a shorter length of stay. The study did not find any significant differences in dehiscence rates or the need for revision surgeries between the two protocols. There was also no identified subgroup of patients that appeared to benefit from the longer 6-week protocol. The findings suggest that a 4-week protocol is sufficient for most patients with SCI undergoing flap surgery for PIs, potentially reducing hospital stay and associated costs without compromising patient outcomes.

Practical Implications

Shorter Hospital Stays

Adopting a 4-week protocol can reduce the length of hospital stays for patients undergoing flap surgery for pressure injuries, potentially lowering healthcare costs.

Faster Remobilization

Implementing a 4-week protocol can lead to faster remobilization to sitting for patients with spinal cord injury, improving their quality of life and functional outcomes.

Resource Optimization

Returning to a 4-week protocol allows for better allocation of resources, as it reduces the need for prolonged bedrest and hospitalization without compromising patient safety or healing outcomes.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Not a randomized-controlled trial
  • 2
    Treatment variables in PI care changed over time
  • 3
    Completeness of SCI was not always known

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury