Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Neurology
  4. Combined cervical transcutaneous with lumbosacral epidural stimulation improves voluntary control of stepping movements in spinal cord injured individuals

Combined cervical transcutaneous with lumbosacral epidural stimulation improves voluntary control of stepping movements in spinal cord injured individuals

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2023 · DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1073716 · Published: February 2, 2023

NeurologyRehabilitationBiomedical

Simple Explanation

This study explores a novel approach to improve walking in individuals with spinal cord injury by combining two types of spinal cord stimulation: transcutaneous (applied through the skin) and epidural (applied via an implanted device). The researchers hypothesized that this combined stimulation could enhance the communication between the brain and spinal cord, leading to better control of leg movements. The study involved four participants who already had an epidural stimulator implanted in their lower back. The researchers then added transcutaneous stimulation at the neck and measured muscle activity and leg movements during attempted stepping, both with and without body weight support. The results suggest that the combined stimulation approach can improve the range of motion, coordination, and muscle output during stepping compared to epidural stimulation alone. This indicates that stimulating the spinal cord at multiple points may be a promising strategy for improving motor function after spinal cord injury.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Four individuals with a prior implanted lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulator
Evidence Level
Original Research

Key Findings

  • 1
    Cervical transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) suppressed the amplitude of motor evoked potentials induced by lumbosacral epidural stimulation (scES) in most lower-extremity muscles.
  • 2
    The combination of scES + scTS generally generated a greater EMG amplitude in the extensors and improved coordination of flexors and extensors during intentional stepping in a gravity neutral device.
  • 3
    On a treadmill with body weight support, individuals with prior step training showed less variability in EMG activity and improved coordination when both scES and scTS were applied.

Research Summary

This study investigated the effects of combined cervical transcutaneous and lumbosacral epidural stimulation on voluntary control of stepping in individuals with chronic motor complete spinal cord injury. The results showed that combined stimulation improved range of motion, motor output amplitude, and coordination during intentional stepping in both non-weight bearing and weight-bearing environments. The study suggests that combined stimulation may enhance neuromodulation of the spinal locomotor-related circuitry and improve voluntary control of stepping in individuals with chronic motor complete paralysis.

Practical Implications

Rehabilitation Strategy

Combined stimulation (scES + scTS) may have potential as a rehabilitative strategy for individuals with severe SCI. Long-term training studies are warranted.

Improved Understanding

The study provides additional evidence on our understanding of neural connectivity and neuromodulation of the injured spinal cord.

Future Research

Further study is needed to determine the unique contributions and cumulative effects of cervical scTS and lumbosacral scES to the modulation of sensorimotor networks.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small sample size
  • 2
    Heterogeneity of the participants
  • 3
    Long-term effects of combination stimulation not evaluated

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Neurology