Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Can Administrative Claim File Review Be Used to Gather Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Psychology Payment Data and Functional Independence Measure Scores? Implications for Rehabilitation Providers in the Private Health Sector

Can Administrative Claim File Review Be Used to Gather Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Psychology Payment Data and Functional Independence Measure Scores? Implications for Rehabilitation Providers in the Private Health Sector

Physiother Can, 2011 · DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2010-25 · Published: July 1, 2011

Spinal Cord InjuryHealthcareRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study explored whether existing electronic claim files could be used to easily gather information about rehabilitation costs and functional status for people with spinal cord injuries (SCI). The research focused on individuals with work-related SCI to see if their claim files contained useful data on payments for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and psychology services, along with a measure of functional independence. The researchers looked at 28 electronic claim files from the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) of Ontario, focusing on individuals who had sustained a work-related SCI. They tried to extract data on payments for the aforementioned therapies and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, which indicate a person's ability to perform daily tasks independently. The study concluded that using administrative claim files in their current format is not practical for gathering the desired data. The information was not consistently organized or complete, making it difficult to use for research purposes. The authors suggest that a more standardized approach to collecting, recording, and sharing data within the rehabilitation industry is needed to improve research and best practices.

Study Duration
8 Years
Participants
28 administrative e-claim files for persons who sustained a work-related SCI between 1996 and 2000
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The process of administrative e-claim file review was not practical for extraction of the targeted data, which included payment data for PT, OT, and psychology services, as well as FIM scores.
  • 2
    The data extracted were considered incomplete, as they did not match the assumptions developed for payment data. For example, it was expected that all e-claim files for persons with complete tetraplegia would yield payment data for OT and PT services, but this was not the case.
  • 3
    There was no FIM score data extracted from any of the e-claim files.

Research Summary

The study evaluated the feasibility of using administrative e-claim file review to extract rehabilitation payment data and functional status for persons with work-related SCI. Researchers reviewed 28 administrative e-claim files, targeting payment data for physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and psychology services, as well as Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. The results indicated that the process of administrative e-claim file review was not practical for extraction of the targeted data. The payment data and FIM scores collected did not meet the criterion for completeness. While it was possible to access e-claim files and the data they contained, the data were not organized in a similar way across e-claim files. The study suggests that a new strategy to standardize collection, recording, and sharing of data in the rehabilitation industry should be explored to promote best practices. The authors highlight the need for mechanisms to ensure the existence of and access to standardized data in both the public and the private health care systems.

Practical Implications

Standardized Data Collection

Implement standardized data collection methods across public and private healthcare sectors to ensure consistency and completeness of rehabilitation data.

Data Sharing Alignment

Align data-sharing practices between public and private health systems to facilitate longitudinal research and improve data consistency.

Minimum Data Set Creation

Create a minimum data set for outpatient SCI rehabilitation, incorporating standard data elements into claim forms to promote data collection by payers and healthcare providers.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Potential for omissions or transcription errors during the e-claim file review process.
  • 2
    Lack of inter-abstractor and intra-abstractor reliability testing.
  • 3
    Assumptions were supported by evidence from the US literature, which may reflect healthcare payment levels and policies that differ from those in Canada.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury