Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Advantages and Limitations in the Evaluation of the Neurological and Functional Deficit in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries

Advantages and Limitations in the Evaluation of the Neurological and Functional Deficit in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries

Clin. Pract., 2023 · DOI: 10.3390/clinpract13010002 · Published: December 27, 2022

Spinal Cord InjuryParticipationNeurology

Simple Explanation

This review discusses the various scales used to evaluate neurological and functional deficits in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI). These scales help standardize assessment and guide treatment based on the severity of the injury. The review categorizes these scales into those that assess neurological deficits and those that assess functional abilities, such as performing daily activities and self-care. The study concludes that the ASIA/IMSOP scale is the most accurate for assessing neurological deficits secondary to SCI and is considered the international standard.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Not specified
Evidence Level
Review

Key Findings

  • 1
    SCI severity scales are used to estimate the functional prognosis of patients after traumatic events. These scales can be divided into those assessing neurological deficit and those assessing functional abilities.
  • 2
    The ASIA/IMSOP scale is highlighted as the most accurate for assessing neurological deficits after SCI and is the international standard.
  • 3
    The WISCI is more accurate for documenting changes in walking levels, while the FIM is more reliable for measuring patient self-care and independence.

Research Summary

The review focuses on the evaluation scales used to determine neurological and functional deficits in patients with vertebral-medullary injuries, highlighting their advantages and limitations. The study identifies and presents relevant tools for assessing SCI, considering both clinical and psychosocial components based on literature. The review concludes that the ASIA/IMSOP scale is the closest to the need for standardization and provides the most accurate assessment of neurological deficits secondary to SCI.

Practical Implications

Standardized Assessment

Use of ASIA/IMSOP for standardized neurological assessment in SCI patients.

Targeted Rehabilitation

Employ WISCI and FIM to track progress in walking ability and self-care, respectively.

Comprehensive Evaluation

Utilize functional assessment scales (BI, MBI, FIM, QIF, SCIM, WISCI, SCI-FAI) to evaluate the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Unclear differentiation between grade C and D of the Frankel scale
  • 2
    Limited responsiveness to subtle neurological improvements during recovery
  • 3
    Weak interobserver reliability for the grading of incomplete SCI in the ASIA/IMSOP scale

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury