Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Surgery
  4. Which Is Better in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes for Lumbar Degenerative Disease of Two Segments: MIS-TLIF or OPEN-TLIF?

Which Is Better in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes for Lumbar Degenerative Disease of Two Segments: MIS-TLIF or OPEN-TLIF?

J. Pers. Med., 2022 · DOI: 10.3390/jpm12121977 · Published: November 30, 2022

SurgerySpinal Disorders

Simple Explanation

This study compares two surgical methods, MIS-TLIF and OPEN-TLIF, for treating lumbar degenerative diseases affecting two spinal segments. The study aims to determine which method provides better clinical and radiological outcomes for patients with this condition. The findings suggest that while both methods have similar outcomes, OPEN-TLIF may be preferable due to lower operation time and radiation exposure.

Study Duration
January 2015 to September 2021
Participants
112 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases of two segments
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The MIS-TLIF group had longer operation times and more intraoperative fluoroscopy times compared to the OPEN-TLIF group.
  • 2
    There was no significant difference in blood loss, postoperative drainage, or postoperative CK content between the two groups.
  • 3
    Pedicle screws were more likely to deviate laterally out of the vertebral body in the MIS-TLIF group.

Research Summary

This study retrospectively analyzed 112 patients with two-level lumbar degenerative diseases treated with either MIS-TLIF or OPEN-TLIF to compare clinical and radiological outcomes. Results indicated similar postoperative quality of life scores and radiological outcomes between the two surgical methods. The study concludes that OPEN-TLIF is recommended for patients with two-segment lumbar degenerative diseases due to shorter operation times and lower radiation exposure.

Practical Implications

Surgical Choice

OPEN-TLIF may be preferred for two-segment lumbar degenerative diseases to minimize operation time and radiation exposure.

Technique Refinement

Surgeons performing MIS-TLIF should focus on improving pedicle screw placement accuracy.

Patient Counseling

Patients should be informed that while both procedures have similar outcomes, MIS-TLIF may involve longer operative times and higher radiation exposure.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Limited number of cases
  • 2
    Limited follow-up time
  • 3
    Single center retrospective study

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Surgery