Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Public Health
  4. The utility of administrative data for neurotrauma surveillance and prevention in Ontario, Canada

The utility of administrative data for neurotrauma surveillance and prevention in Ontario, Canada

BMC Research Notes, 2012 · DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-584 · Published: October 25, 2012

Public Health

Simple Explanation

This paper reviews existing data sources in Ontario to see how well they can track neurotrauma cases (brain and spinal cord injuries). The goal is to find reliable ways to monitor these injuries, which helps in creating effective prevention programs. The study looked at administrative data from Ontario's health care system and national surveys. They checked if these sources had the information needed for neurotrauma surveillance, using guidelines from the World Health Organization. The research identifies which data sources are most useful for keeping track of neurotrauma cases and examines the pros and cons of using these sources. It shows how administrative data can help monitor neurotrauma and be a cost-effective way to create and assess injury prevention programs.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Population-based data in Ontario, Canada
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Five key data sources were identified for neurotrauma surveillance: National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS), Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), Comprehensive Data Set of the Ontario Trauma Registry (OTR CDS), Statistics Canada’s Vital Statistics Death Database, and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB).
  • 2
    NACRS and DAD include demographic, clinical, and administrative data. They track patients across care continuum, allow geographical analysis, but have data delays and limited death records.
  • 3
    The OTR CDS offers data elements relevant for injury prevention surveillance like the Abbreviated Injury Scale and helmet use, but it's limited to eleven lead trauma hospitals with serious injuries.

Research Summary

The study aimed to critically examine data sources that identify the nature and occurrence of neurotrauma at the population level in Canada, using Ontario as an example. Five key data sources, including NACRS and DAD, were identified as most relevant, while others were deemed useful, not identifiable, or not relevant. The research emphasizes that using existing administrative data is a cost-effective way to facilitate neurotrauma surveillance, informing practice and policy in Ontario.

Practical Implications

Improved Surveillance

Identifies key data sources for tracking neurotrauma, enabling better monitoring and prevention efforts.

Cost-Effective Prevention

Using existing administrative data reduces costs associated with primary data collection.

Informed Policy and Practice

Provides insights into mechanisms of injury, risk factors, and prevalence to guide neurotrauma prevention strategies.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Data delays in NACRS and DAD.
  • 2
    Limited death records in NACRS and DAD.
  • 3
    OTR CDS data is based on a small subset of injury admissions.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Public Health