Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Surgery
  4. The efficacy and safety of ultrasonic bone scalpel for removing retrovertebral osteophytes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study

The efficacy and safety of ultrasonic bone scalpel for removing retrovertebral osteophytes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study

Scientific Reports, 2024 · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50545-y · Published: January 9, 2024

SurgeryOrthopedics

Simple Explanation

This study introduces a surgical technique using an ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) to remove large bone growths (osteophytes) from the back of the neck vertebrae during spinal fusion surgery. The study compares the UBS method to the traditional high-speed drill (HSD) approach, focusing on safety and effectiveness in reducing operative time and bleeding. Results showed the UBS method reduced operation time and blood loss, with similar clinical improvements compared to the HSD method, suggesting it's a safe and effective alternative.

Study Duration
January 2020 and September 2022
Participants
56 patients undergoing ACDF for retrovertebral osteophytes
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The use of UBS resulted in significantly shorter operation times compared to HSD (92.1 vs 123.7 minutes, P < 0.05).
  • 2
    Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the UBS group compared to the HSD group (71.4 vs 112.0 mL, P < 0.05).
  • 3
    Clinical outcomes, measured by JOA and VAS scores, and bone graft fusion rates were comparable between the UBS and HSD groups at 6 and 12 months post-surgery (P > 0.05).

Research Summary

This study evaluated the use of an ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) for removing retrovertebral osteophytes during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) compared to the traditional high-speed drill (HSD). The results indicated that UBS reduced operative time and intraoperative blood loss while achieving comparable clinical outcomes and bone graft fusion rates to HSD. The authors conclude that combining UBS with HSD-assisted ACDF is a superior option for removing large posterior cervical osteophytes, offering a safe and effective alternative.

Practical Implications

Surgical Efficiency

UBS can reduce operative time and blood loss in ACDF procedures for retrovertebral osteophyte removal.

Patient Safety

UBS offers a safe alternative to HSD, potentially minimizing the risk of dural tears and spinal cord injuries due to its tissue selectivity.

Clinical Outcome

Clinical outcomes, including pain relief and neurological function improvement, are comparable between UBS and HSD methods, indicating UBS is a viable option.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Retrospective comparative study design
  • 2
    Data collected from a single surgeon at a single medical institution
  • 3
    Relatively small sample size

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Surgery