Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Neurology
  4. Synaptic Plasticity on Motoneurons After Axotomy: A Necessary Change in Paradigm

Synaptic Plasticity on Motoneurons After Axotomy: A Necessary Change in Paradigm

Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 2020 · DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.00068 · Published: April 30, 2020

NeurologyGenetics

Simple Explanation

Peripheral nerve injuries cause motoneurons to undergo changes in their synaptic inputs, accompanied by a neuroinflammatory response involving microglia and astrocytes. The functional importance and underlying mechanisms of these changes remain unclear. This review proposes dividing synaptic plasticity around injured motoneurons into two processes: rapid, microglia-independent synapse shedding that reverses after muscle reinnervation, and a slower, microglia-dependent mechanism that permanently alters spinal cord circuitry. The slower mechanism eliminates sensory Ia afferent proprioceptor axon collaterals, reconfiguring ventral horn motor circuits to function without direct sensory feedback. The reversible changes occur while motoneurons regenerate and involve a transient reduction in fast synaptic activity, possibly replaced by slow GABA depolarizations for regenerative mechanisms.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Not specified
Evidence Level
Review article

Key Findings

  • 1
    Synaptic plasticity around axotomized motoneurons should be divided into two distinct processes: a rapid cell-autonomous, microglia-independent shedding of synapses and a slower microglia-dependent mechanism that permanently alters spinal cord circuitry.
  • 2
    The slower mechanism fully eliminates from the ventral horn the axon collaterals of peripherally injured and regenerating sensory Ia afferent proprioceptors, reconfiguring ventral horn motor circuitries to function after regeneration without direct sensory feedback from muscle.
  • 3
    Reversible synaptic changes on the cell bodies occur only while motoneurons are regenerating and generally result in a transient reduction of fast synaptic activity that is probably replaced by embryonic-like slow GABA depolarizations.

Research Summary

This review compiles data to provide a framework for interpreting synaptic plasticity around axotomized motoneurons, dividing it into two distinct processes: rapid synapse shedding and a slower mechanism altering spinal cord circuitry. The rapid process involves cell-autonomous, microglia-independent shedding of synapses from motoneuron cell bodies and proximal dendrites, reversible after muscle reinnervation. The slower mechanism is microglia-dependent and permanently eliminates sensory Ia afferent proprioceptor axon collaterals, reconfiguring motor circuits to function without direct sensory feedback, modulated by injury severity.

Practical Implications

Re-evaluation of Synaptic Stripping

The traditional view of synaptic stripping as a single phenomenon needs reconsideration, acknowledging different plastic changes in various synapses.

Rethinking Regeneration Mechanisms

The assumption that synapse withdrawal is necessary for motoneuron regeneration should be re-evaluated, considering the role of electrical stimulation and exercise.

Targeted Therapies

Understanding the distinct mechanisms of synaptic plasticity after nerve injury can lead to more targeted therapeutic interventions to improve motor function recovery.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Diversity of models used to study synaptic plasticity introduces high variance in reported results.
  • 2
    Lack of complete understanding of the functional significance and mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.
  • 3
    The extent to which the loss of inputs represents an undesirable outcome affecting motor function recovery or an adaptive mechanism is unknown.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Neurology