Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Neurology
  4. Surgical Approaches to Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Patients: A Literature Review

Surgical Approaches to Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Patients: A Literature Review

Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 2021 · DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2021.709969 · Published: August 31, 2021

NeurologyOrthopedicsRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

Spasticity, a common issue in upper motor neuron disorders, can cause stiffness and limit movement, affecting daily activities. While rehabilitation specialists primarily manage spasticity, surgical options are often overlooked in rehabilitation guidelines. This review aims to evaluate the evidence for neuro-orthopedic surgical techniques in the upper limb for adult patients with spasticity. The review examines various surgical techniques, including muscle releases, tendon lengthening, neurectomies, and arthrodesis, for addressing spasticity in the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers. The surgeries aim to improve muscle balance, stabilize joints, correct deformities, and ultimately enhance function, reduce pain, and improve hygiene and appearance. The study emphasizes that surgical procedures are complex and tailored to individual patient needs, making it difficult to evaluate each procedure in isolation. Despite the heterogeneity of studies and lack of clinical trials, the review suggests that surgery can be beneficial in carefully selected cases when combined with other rehabilitation treatments.

Study Duration
From 1980 to July 2, 2020
Participants
Adult patients with upper limb spasticity
Evidence Level
Literature Review

Key Findings

  • 1
    Most surgical procedures for upper limb spasticity are complex, consisting of several techniques based on the patient's problems and goals, which interferes with evaluating each procedure individually.
  • 2
    The review found a lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with most studies being case series or retrospective reviews, limiting the level of evidence for the efficacy of different surgical techniques.
  • 3
    Almost all studies suggested good results after surgery in carefully selected cases, with goals of reducing spasticity and improving function, pain, hygiene, and appearance.

Research Summary

This literature review examines neuro-orthopedic surgical techniques for upper limb spasticity in adults, aiming to evaluate the evidence for their efficacy. The review covers various surgical approaches for the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers. The review identifies a lack of high-quality studies, with most being case series or retrospective reviews. The heterogeneity of procedures and patient populations makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of specific techniques. Despite the limitations, the review suggests that surgery can be a beneficial component of rehabilitation for carefully selected patients with upper limb spasticity, when combined with other treatments like splinting, physical therapy, and pharmacological interventions.

Practical Implications

Improved Patient Selection

A more unified approach and criteria are needed to facilitate evidence-based patient referral and surgical selection.

Need for Further Research

Further studies with larger sample sizes and better study designs, such as case-control studies or single-case experimental designs, are needed to strengthen the evidence base.

Collaborative Approach

A collaborative, evidence-based pathway involving non-surgical clinicians and surgical teams is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Heterogeneity of participants and procedures across studies.
  • 2
    Absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
  • 3
    Lack of standardized functional outcome measurement tools.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Neurology