Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Neurology
  4. Studies in the Falls Efficacy Scale-International for patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: Reliability, validity, and minimum clinically important difference

Studies in the Falls Efficacy Scale-International for patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: Reliability, validity, and minimum clinically important difference

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2024 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2192849 · Published: July 1, 2024

NeurologyOrthopedicsRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

Patients with cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM) often experience balance problems, leading to a fear of falling. The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is used to measure these concerns. This study aims to validate the FES-I for use in CCM patients. The study involved administering the FES-I to patients before and after surgery for CCM. Researchers also looked at other measures of neurological function and balance to see if they correlated with the FES-I scores, assessing reliability and validity. The results showed that the FES-I is a reliable and valid tool for measuring balance problems in CCM patients. The study also identified a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) to help doctors interpret meaningful changes in patient scores.

Study Duration
June 2015 and February 2021
Participants
151 patients who underwent surgery for CCM
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The FES-I demonstrated acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97 at both baseline and 1 year postoperatively, indicating reliability.
  • 2
    Significant correlations were found between the FES-I and the cJOA-LE score (a measure of lower extremity function) and stabilometric parameters, confirming convergent validity.
  • 3
    The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the FES-I, calculated using anchor- and distribution-based methods, was estimated to be 5.5 and 10, respectively.

Research Summary

This study evaluated the reliability, validity, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) for assessing impaired body balance in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM). The FES-I was found to be a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for evaluating body balance problems in the CCM population, showing strong internal consistency and convergent validity with clinical and stabilometric measures. The study established thresholds for the MCID, which can assist clinicians in recognizing the clinical significance of changes in patient status, aiding in the interpretation of FES-I scores in clinical practice.

Practical Implications

Clinical Assessment

The FES-I can be used to reliably and validly assess body balance problems in patients with CCM.

Treatment Evaluation

The established MCID thresholds can help clinicians determine if changes in FES-I scores following interventions are clinically meaningful.

Research

The validated FES-I can be used in future research to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatments for improving body balance in CCM patients.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Retrospective study design
  • 2
    Test-retest reliability was not examined in this study.
  • 3
    The study included only Japanese patients, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Neurology