Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Assistive Technology
  4. Performance Evaluation of a Mobile Touchscreen Interface for Assistive Robotic Manipulators: A Pilot Study

Performance Evaluation of a Mobile Touchscreen Interface for Assistive Robotic Manipulators: A Pilot Study

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2017 · DOI: 10.1310/sci2302-131 · Published: January 1, 2017

Assistive TechnologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study evaluates the performance of a touchscreen interface compared to a joystick interface for controlling assistive robotic manipulators (ARMs). The goal is to improve the usability of ARMs for people with upper extremity impairments. Participants with upper extremity impairments were trained on both interfaces and then used one to perform tasks on the ARMET (ARM evaluation tool). The time to complete each task was recorded. The results showed that the touchscreen interface was generally preferred and resulted in faster task completion times compared to the joystick interface. The touchscreen interface was considered easier to learn and required less physical effort.

Study Duration
From 2014 to 2016
Participants
8 people with upper extremity impairments
Evidence Level
Pilot study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Seven out of eight participants preferred the touchscreen interface over the joystick interface.
  • 2
    The touchscreen interface resulted in enhanced ARMET performance, including higher mean moving speed and faster task completion.
  • 3
    Participants reported that the touchscreen interface was easier to use and required less physical effort compared to the joystick.

Research Summary

The study compared a touchscreen UI with a joystick UI for controlling ARMs, using the ARMET to evaluate performance. The touchscreen UI was preferred by most participants and resulted in better performance in terms of task completion time and mean velocity. The researchers concluded that the touchscreen UI might be a more efficient tool for ARM users due to its accessibility, ease of learning, and reduced physical effort.

Practical Implications

Improved ARM Usability

Touchscreen interfaces can enhance the usability of ARMs for individuals with upper extremity impairments.

Increased Independence

Easier to use ARMs can promote greater independence in daily activities for people with disabilities.

Wider Adoption of ARMs

Accessible and efficient interfaces can encourage wider adoption of ARMs among potential users.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The sample size was small, with only eight participants.
  • 2
    There was an unbalanced sample size between the two user interfaces, with only one participant using the joystick.
  • 3
    All participants were first-time ARM users, so their performance was not optimized.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Assistive Technology