Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Surgery
  4. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the medial foraminal and interlaminar approaches: A comparative study with 2-year follow-up

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the medial foraminal and interlaminar approaches: A comparative study with 2-year follow-up

Frontiers in Surgery, 2022 · DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.990751 · Published: November 2, 2022

SurgeryOrthopedics

Simple Explanation

This study compares two minimally invasive surgical techniques for lumbar disc herniation (LDH): percutaneous endoscopic medial foraminal discectomy (PEMFD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). The aim was to assess the clinical effectiveness of PEMFD in treating LDH. PEID involves removing a portion of the ligamentum flavum (LF) to access the herniated disc, which can lead to bleeding and postoperative adhesions. PEMFD is a modified technique that aims to preserve the LF. The study found that PEMFD resulted in lower intraoperative bleeding and preserved the LF better than PEID, while both techniques had similar short- and medium-term clinical outcomes.

Study Duration
2 years
Participants
86 patients with single-level LDH
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage were significantly lower in the PEMFD group compared to the PEID group.
  • 2
    Numbness scores at 72 hours post-surgery and pain/disability scores at 1 month post-surgery significantly differed between the groups, but these differences were not sustained at 6, 12, and 24 months.
  • 3
    There was no significant difference in satisfactory outcomes based on the modified MacNab criteria at the 24-month follow-up between the two groups.

Research Summary

This study compared PEMFD and PEID for treating single-level LDH. PEMFD demonstrated advantages, including lower bleeding volume and LF preservation. Short-term differences in numbness and pain scores favored PEMFD, but medium-term (up to 2 years) outcomes were similar between the two techniques. The findings suggest that PEMFD is a safe and effective alternative to PEID for LDH, with the benefit of potentially reducing postoperative complications related to LF removal.

Practical Implications

Surgical Technique Selection

Surgeons can consider PEMFD as a viable option for single-level LDH, especially when LF preservation is desired.

Reduced Bleeding Risk

PEMFD may be preferred in patients where minimizing intraoperative bleeding is crucial.

Long-term Outcome Considerations

While short-term benefits exist, patients should be informed that long-term pain relief and functional outcomes are similar between both techniques.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Retrospective study design
  • 2
    Single surgeon performed all procedures
  • 3
    The sample size was relatively small

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Surgery