Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Surgery
  4. Long-Segment Versus Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Including Fractured Vertebrae for the Management of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Long-Segment Versus Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Including Fractured Vertebrae for the Management of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Cureus, 2023 · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35235 · Published: February 20, 2023

SurgeryTraumaOrthopedics

Simple Explanation

This study compares two surgical techniques for unstable thoracolumbar fractures: short-segment fixation with fracture level inclusion (SSFIFL) and long-segment pedicle fixation (LSPF). The study looks at radiological and clinical outcomes. Researchers analyzed 80 patients with partial spinal cord injuries, dividing them into two groups of 40, each undergoing one of the two surgical procedures. They measured outcomes using radiological and clinical parameters before and after surgery. The study found no significant differences in radiological indicators or neurological outcomes between the two groups. However, the SSFIFL group experienced less surgical time, blood loss, and implant cost.

Study Duration
January 2015 to January 2019
Participants
80 patients with unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures and incomplete spinal cord injuries
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    No significant differences were found in radiological outcomes (kyphotic angle, kyphotic deformation, Beck index) between SSFIFL and LSPF groups at the final follow-up.
  • 2
    Neurological outcomes were similar in both groups, with no significant difference in ASIA grade improvement.
  • 3
    SSFIFL had significantly less operative time, blood loss, and implant cost compared to LSPF.

Research Summary

This study compared short-segment fixation with fracture level inclusion (SSFIFL) to long-segment pedicle fixation (LSPF) for treating unstable thoracolumbar fractures with partial spinal cord injuries. The study found no significant differences in radiological or neurological outcomes between the two groups. Both techniques improved patient conditions effectively. SSFIFL offers the advantage of being a motion segment-saving and cost-effective procedure, with reduced operative time, blood loss, and implant costs.

Practical Implications

Surgical Decision-Making

Surgeons can consider SSFIFL as a viable option for unstable thoracolumbar fractures, especially when motion segment preservation and cost-effectiveness are priorities.

Resource Optimization

Hospitals and healthcare systems can benefit from reduced operative time, blood loss, and implant costs associated with SSFIFL.

Patient-Specific Approach

The choice between SSFIFL and LSPF should be made carefully based on individual patient circumstances and surgeon experience.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Single-center design
  • 2
    Limited sample size
  • 3
    Shorter follow-up period

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Surgery