Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Neurology
  4. It Takes Two: Non Invasive Brain Stimulation Combined with Neurorehabilitation

It Takes Two: Non Invasive Brain Stimulation Combined with Neurorehabilitation

Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015 · DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.019 · Published: April 1, 2015

NeurologyNeurorehabilitation

Simple Explanation

The main goal of neurorehabilitation is to help patients regain as much function as possible after a neurological injury, ideally by leveraging the brain's ability to adapt and reorganize itself. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, like TMS and tDCS, can directly target brain structures to either boost or calm their activity, which helps guide the brain's recovery process. These techniques, combined with advances in stereotactic navigation and electric field modeling, allow for more precise targeting of specific brain areas in patients, both for diagnosis and treatment. This supplement highlights the significance of TMS and tDCS in neurorehabilitation for various conditions like stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. The supplement emphasizes that non-invasive brain stimulation, whether used alone or with neurorehabilitation, can work together to significantly improve clinical outcomes. The included articles showcase the technologies' diagnostic abilities compared to neuroimaging and highlight their therapeutic benefits, optimal delivery methods, and factors influencing patient response.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Not specified
Evidence Level
Level 5, Expert Opinion

Key Findings

  • 1
    Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques like TMS and tDCS, can directly target brain structures to either boost or calm their activity, which helps guide the brain's recovery process.
  • 2
    The study demonstrates that non-invasive brain stimulation can enhance the efficacy, duration, and number of patients benefiting from neurorehabilitative therapies.
  • 3
    The research suggests that combining non-invasive brain stimulation with neurorehabilitation creates a synergistic effect, potentially revolutionizing clinical practice.

Research Summary

This supplement explores the role of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), specifically transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in neurorehabilitation. It emphasizes the potential of NIBS to directly target brain structures, facilitate neural plasticity, and improve outcomes for various neurological conditions. The articles within the supplement address the clinical application of TMS and tDCS, highlighting their diagnostic capabilities, therapeutic benefits, optimal delivery methods, and factors influencing patient response. They also discuss the importance of understanding the interactions between pathophysiology and the brain's innate reorganization. The supplement concludes that NIBS, whether used alone or in combination with neurorehabilitation, has the potential to transform clinical practice. It calls for further research to optimize the use of these techniques and to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from them.

Practical Implications

Enhanced Diagnostic Capabilities

Navigated TMS offers a cost-effective clinical diagnostic modality, complementing state-of-the-art imaging techniques, to reveal mechanisms of functional motor recovery.

Improved Therapeutic Outcomes

Combining tDCS with rehabilitation can improve clinical outcomes and optimize kinematic parameters in pediatric stroke survivors, maximizing benefits within therapy limits.

Personalized Treatment Strategies

Individualized approaches using rTMS can modify cortical excitability and improve symptoms in focal hand dystonia, providing a model to stratify likely responders.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The reliability of TMS as a diagnostic tool is a key roadblock.
  • 2
    Inconsistencies in therapeutic benefits of rTMS and tDCS due to variable patient characteristics and dosing.
  • 3
    Limited studies addressing affective-emotional and cognitive-evaluative dimensions in chronic pain treatment with rTMS.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Neurology