Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Regenerative Medicine
  4. Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration

Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration

Nat Rev Neurosci, 2006 · DOI: 10.1038/nrn1956 · Published: August 1, 2006

Regenerative MedicineNeurology

Simple Explanation

Damage to the adult central nervous system (CNS) often results in lasting disabilities because mature nerve fibers (axons) cannot regrow after injury. The glial environment, including inhibitory molecules in myelin and proteoglycans in astroglial scars, hinders axon regeneration. Researchers are studying the molecular basis of these inhibitory influences to understand why long-distance axon repair and structural plasticity are limited. Understanding glial inhibition is crucial for developing therapies that promote functional recovery after neural injury. The failure of axons to regenerate in the adult CNS may be due to a decline in the intrinsic growth ability of neurons and the presence of inhibitory or repulsive guidance cues that persist into adulthood. The glial environment differs from the PNS, with myelin structure and glial scars acting as barriers.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Not specified
Evidence Level
Review

Key Findings

  • 1
    CNS myelin and glial scars inhibit axon outgrowth, but their relative importance in vivo is uncertain. Myelin inhibitors are constitutively expressed, while CSPGs are strongly upregulated following injury, with different time courses of expression ranging from 24 hours to 6 months post-lesion.
  • 2
    Receptor mechanisms for myelin inhibition have been elucidated, including the Nogo-66 receptor (NgR) and transmembrane co-receptors such as p75, TROY, and LINGO1. However, recent studies using NgR-mutant mice have challenged the oversimplified scenario that the NgR complex is the major receptor for myelin-associated signals.
  • 3
    Intracellular signaling pathways, such as RhoA/ROCK, PKC, and EGFR, are common to multiple sources of inhibition and could offer a greater prospect for promoting axon regeneration. These pathways mediate myelin inhibition and are also triggered by CSPGs.

Research Summary

The review discusses the inhibitory molecules in the adult CNS environment responsible for regenerative failure after injury. These inhibitors are associated with later stages of nervous system development and limit axon repair after injury and local plasticity in the intact adult. Blocking inhibitory influences in spinal cord injury models has had limited success, possibly due to overlap and cross-compensation between inhibitory signals and the reduced intrinsic ability of mature axons for long-distance regeneration. Removing these influences could induce short-range rearrangements of neuronal processes to enhance stroke recovery. Strategies to overcome glial inhibition could be more useful for conditions such as stroke, where local short-range sprouting is important. Combinatorial approaches to block extrinsic inhibition while enhancing the intrinsic growth programme of the neurons could improve outcomes in spinal cord injury.

Practical Implications

Therapeutic Development

Understanding glial inhibition is crucial for developing therapies to promote functional recovery after neural injury, shifting from palliative care to actual restoration of function.

Combinatorial Approaches

Combining treatments that block extrinsic inhibition with strategies that enhance the intrinsic growth program of neurons could lead to improved outcomes in spinal cord injury.

Clinical Applications

Pharmacological treatments targeting intracellular pathways common to myelin and CSPG inhibition, such as EGFR kinase inhibitors, show promise and may be readily tested in clinical trials for nerve repair.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Variations in genetic background and differential compensatory mechanisms in different mouse strains may obscure the effects of genetic deletions.
  • 2
    Pharmacokinetic properties of compounds or the method of delivery may affect the outcomes of pharmacological treatments.
  • 3
    Lack of standardization in criteria used to distinguish bona fide regeneration from collateral sprouting or fiber sparing complicates the evaluation of results.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Regenerative Medicine