Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Regenerative Medicine
  4. Genetic, epigenetic, and post-transcriptional basis of divergent tissue regenerative capacities among vertebrates

Genetic, epigenetic, and post-transcriptional basis of divergent tissue regenerative capacities among vertebrates

Advanced Genetics, 2021 · DOI: 10.1002/ggn2.10042 · Published: May 3, 2021

Regenerative MedicineGenetics

Simple Explanation

Regenerative capacity varies widely in the animal kingdom, with invertebrates like planarians capable of regenerating entire organisms. Within vertebrates, phylogenetically primitive organisms such as zebrafish and urodele amphibians can regenerate limbs, spinal cords, and hearts, while adult mammals are largely limited to regenerating specific tissues. This review examines the regenerative capacities of appendages, spinal cords, and hearts in model organisms like zebrafish, axolotl salamanders, frogs, and mice, highlighting genetic and epigenetic commonalities across vertebrate species and addressing theories for the decline in regenerative capacity during evolution. Despite divergent tissue regeneration capacities across the animal kingdom, there are commonalities among appendage, heart, and spinal cord regeneration in fish, amphibians, and mammals. Regeneration is generally nerve-dependent and governed by conserved genetic, epigenetic, and post-transcriptional machinery.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Not specified
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Nerves play a crucial role in organ regeneration across diverse species, influencing progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation through the production of promoting factors, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved role of nerves in regeneration across vertebrates.
  • 2
    Regulatory enhancers, like the lepb-linked regeneration enhancer (LEN) in zebrafish, direct regeneration-specific gene expression and may explain variance in regenerative capacity, with potential for reactivation in mammals despite evolutionary loss.
  • 3
    Epigenetic modifications, including histone demethylation and methylation, regulate gene accessibility and play a critical role in regenerative processes, with modifications capable of both stimulating and stymying regeneration.

Research Summary

Regeneration varies across the animal kingdom, with simpler vertebrates exhibiting greater regenerative capabilities than complex vertebrates. The review focuses on appendage, spinal cord, and heart regeneration in model organisms. Despite differences in regenerative capacity, commonalities exist in the mechanisms of regeneration across vertebrates. These include nerve dependence, regulatory enhancers, epigenetic modifications, and miRNA involvement. Potential explanations for the differences in regenerative capacities include the acquisition of endothermy and the development of a more advanced immune response, which may have been selected over regenerative traits during evolution.

Practical Implications

Therapeutic Potential

Understanding conserved regenerative mechanisms may allow researchers to reactivate dormant regeneration-associated genes in mammals for therapeutic purposes.

Evolutionary Trade-offs

The decline in regenerative potential may be a trade-off for the acquisition of other traits, such as endothermy, which improved fitness in certain species.

Comparative Analysis

Comparative analyses across the animal kingdom can identify shared regenerative tropes and facilitate the development of genetic models in nontraditional organisms.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    [object Object]
  • 2
    [object Object]
  • 3
    [object Object]

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Regenerative Medicine