Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Orthopedics
  4. Concussion in para sport: the first position statement of the Concussion in Para Sport (CIPS) Group

Concussion in para sport: the first position statement of the Concussion in Para Sport (CIPS) Group

Br J Sports Med, 2021 · DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103696 · Published: April 9, 2021

OrthopedicsBrain Injury

Simple Explanation

This paper addresses the need for specific concussion guidelines for para-athletes, as previous guidelines have not adequately considered this population. The Concussion in Para Sport (CIPS) group was formed to analyze and discuss para-athlete-specific issues within the established clinical domains of the current concussion in sport consensus statement. The group evaluated the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 (SCAT5) to identify any para athlete-specific concerns. They emphasize the importance of preparticipation and periodic health examinations to determine a baseline reference point for concussion symptoms, while acknowledging the challenges in interpreting these for para-athletes. The statement provides recommendations for concussion assessment and management, including the need for greater understanding among medical staff, coaches, and athletes. It also suggests future research to investigate assessment tools and concussion prevention strategies for para-athletes.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Multidisciplinary panel of experts
Evidence Level
Consensus statement

Key Findings

  • 1
    The SCAT5 should not be used in and of itself to make, or exclude, the diagnosis of concussion in a para athlete, and a para athlete may have a concussion even if their SCAT5 is deemed to be ‘normal’.
  • 2
    Routine baseline periodic preparticipation examinations (PPE) are emphasized in order to establish a point of reference for the assessment of concussion symptoms in the future.
  • 3
    Case-by-case decision making related to RTS postconcussion is crucial for non-para athletes. Given the unique presentations of many para athletes, this individualisation of care is even more paramount.

Research Summary

This consensus statement addresses the lack of specific guidelines for concussion management in para-athletes. It highlights the need for tailored approaches due to the unique challenges presented by various impairments. The statement emphasizes the importance of clinical judgment, comprehensive pre-injury assessments, and individualized return-to-sport strategies. Adaptations to existing tools like SCAT5 are necessary, and a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. The authors call for further research to develop better understanding of concussion in para-athletes and improved education for clinicians, coaches, and athletes. Collaboration among sporting organizations is essential to improve safety and welfare.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

Clinicians should not rely solely on SCAT5 for concussion diagnosis in para-athletes and should emphasize baseline assessments.

Return to Sport

Return-to-sport strategies need to be individualized and sport-specific, considering the unique impairments of each athlete.

Education and Awareness

Increased education and awareness are needed for clinicians, coaches, and athletes regarding concussion management in para-sports.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Lack of validated assessment tools for para-athletes.
  • 2
    Underreporting and misreporting of concussions in para-sports.
  • 3
    Limited research on concussion prevention strategies specific to para-sports.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Orthopedics