Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Regenerative Medicine
  4. Cellular response to spinal cord injury in regenerative and non-regenerative stages in Xenopus laevis

Cellular response to spinal cord injury in regenerative and non-regenerative stages in Xenopus laevis

Neural Development, 2021 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-021-00152-2 · Published: January 14, 2021

Regenerative Medicine

Simple Explanation

This research compares how spinal cords heal in young frog larvae (which can regenerate) versus older froglets (which cannot). The study looks at cell activity and tissue changes after spinal cord injury at different developmental stages. In larvae, the spinal cord quickly seals and regrows, with new nerve cells forming. In froglets, the spinal cord doesn't close properly, and scar tissue develops instead. The researchers identified specific cells (NSPCs) that are key for spinal cord regeneration in larvae. When these cells are removed, the larvae can no longer regenerate their spinal cords.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Xenopus laevis frogs at regenerative (NF stage 50) and non-regenerative stages (NF stage 66)
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Regenerative stages show rapid sealing of injured stumps, proliferation of cells lining the central canal, and formation of rosette-like structures.
  • 2
    Non-regenerative stages exhibit mostly damaged tissue, fibroblast-like cells, and deposition of extracellular matrix components without spinal cord reconstruction.
  • 3
    Neural stem progenitor cells (NSPCs) are activated during regeneration, differentiating into neurons and glial cells, and their ablation abolishes proper regeneration.

Research Summary

The study compares the cellular response to spinal cord injury in regenerative (R-stage) and non-regenerative (NR-stage) Xenopus laevis. R-stages exhibit rapid spinal cord restoration, activation of neural stem progenitor cells (NSPCs), and minimal glial scar formation, while NR-stages show damaged tissue, fibroblast infiltration, and glial scar development. The zebrafish GFAP transgenic line is a reliable tool to study NSPCs, confirming their role in functional spinal cord regeneration, as their ablation impairs regeneration.

Practical Implications

Targeted Therapies

Understanding the molecular mechanisms driving NSPC activation could lead to targeted therapies that promote spinal cord regeneration in non-regenerative models.

Scar Prevention

Identifying factors that prevent glial scar formation in regenerative stages could inform strategies to minimize scar tissue in mammalian spinal cord injuries.

NSPC Activation Strategies

Further research into the signals that activate NSPCs could lead to methods to stimulate endogenous repair mechanisms in the injured spinal cord.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Limited mechanistic insights into the signals triggering NSPC activation.
  • 2
    Focus primarily on cellular responses, with less emphasis on molecular signaling pathways.
  • 3
    Single biological replicate for RNAseq analysis.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Regenerative Medicine