Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Regenerative Medicine
  4. Batch Effects during Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Propagation Prevail Donor Variation and Culture Duration: Impact on Genotype, Phenotype and Function

Batch Effects during Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Propagation Prevail Donor Variation and Culture Duration: Impact on Genotype, Phenotype and Function

Cells, 2022 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11060946 · Published: March 10, 2022

Regenerative Medicine

Simple Explanation

This study investigates how different methods of growing bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) can affect their properties and function. The focus is on comparing the use of human platelet lysate (hPL) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) during cell growth. The study found that the method used to grow the cells (hPL vs. FBS) had a greater impact on their characteristics than the natural differences between cells from different donors. This means that the culture conditions significantly influence the cells' gene expression, physical traits, and ability to regenerate cartilage. The research highlights the importance of carefully considering the materials used in cell culture, as they can significantly alter the properties of the cells and affect their suitability for use in therapies, particularly in skeletal regeneration.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Four healthy donor-derived bone marrow aspirates
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    hPL significantly increased BMSC proliferation, created significantly different gene expression trajectories and distinct surface marker signatures, already after just one passage.
  • 2
    Expansion in xenogenic serum resulted in significant loss of function during 3D cartilage disk formation and significantly increased clotting risk.
  • 3
    Data demonstrate pronounced batch effects on BMSC transcriptome, phenotype and function due to serum factors, partly outcompeting donor variation after just one culture passage.

Research Summary

The study aimed to determine whether batch effects related to cell culture materials could influence BMSC gene expression, phenotype, and function, specifically examining the impact of hPL versus FBS on BMSC transcriptomics, cell surface proteomics, and osteochondral regenerative competence. The results showed that culture conditions (hPL vs. FBS) were a major driver of variation, leading to distinct gene expression trajectories and impacting cell surface marker profiles. hPL-expanded BMSCs displayed superior proliferation and chondrogenic potential compared to FBS-expanded cells. Extended culture in FBS resulted in a significant loss of chondrogenic potential and increased clotting risk, whereas hPL-expanded BMSCs maintained chondrogenesis and showed a less pronounced increase in procoagulant activity.

Practical Implications

Optimized Cell Manufacturing

The findings emphasize the importance of carefully selecting cell culture materials to minimize batch effects and ensure consistent cell quality for therapeutic applications.

Improved Skeletal Regeneration

The study supports the use of hPL for BMSC propagation in skeletal regeneration, as it promotes superior cell proliferation, chondrogenic potential, and reduced clotting risk compared to FBS.

Potency Assay Development

The identified signatures of batch effects can be used to develop sensitive potency assays for cell-based therapeutics, ensuring stringent release criteria and predicting therapeutic efficacy.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The study used a limited number of donors (n=4).
  • 2
    The exact mechanisms driving the observed batch effects remain unclear.
  • 3
    Long-term in vivo studies are needed to validate the findings.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Regenerative Medicine