Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Growth associated protein 43 and neurofilament immunolabeling in the transected lumbar spinal cord of lizard indicates limited axonal regeneration

Growth associated protein 43 and neurofilament immunolabeling in the transected lumbar spinal cord of lizard indicates limited axonal regeneration

Neural Regeneration Research, 2022 · DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.324850 · Published: May 1, 2022

Spinal Cord InjuryRegenerative MedicineNeurology

Simple Explanation

This study investigates the limited axonal regeneration in the spinal cord of lizards after injury. After transection of the lumbar spinal cord in lizards, a glial-connective tissue bridge that reconnects the rostral and caudal stumps of the interrupted spinal cord is formed at 11–34 days post-injury. Following an initial paralysis some recovery of hindlimb movements occurs within 1–3 months post-injury. The study uses immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis for a growth associated protein 43 (GAP-43) and neurofilament protein to observe axonal regeneration. The findings suggest that a limited axonal re-connection of the transected spinal cord occurs 1–3 months post-injury in lizards, contributing to the recovery of hind-limb movements after initial paralysis.

Study Duration
11–34 days and 3 months
Participants
14 adult wall lizards (Podarcis muralis)
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Sparse GAP-43 positive axons are present in the proximal stump of the spinal cord but their number decreased in the bridge at 11–34 days post-transection.
  • 2
    Few immunolabeled axons with a neurofilament protein of 200–220 kDa were seen in the bridge at 11–22 days post-transection but their number increased at 34 days and 3 months post-amputation in lizards that have recovered some hindlimb movements.
  • 3
    Numerous neurons in the rostral and caudal stumps of the spinal cord were also labeled for GAP43, indicating that GAP-43 biosynthesis is related to axonal regeneration and sprouting from neurons that were damaged by the transection.

Research Summary

This study investigates axonal regeneration in the transected lumbar spinal cord of lizards, focusing on the presence of GAP-43 and neurofilament proteins. The research demonstrates that a glial-connective tissue bridge forms at 11–34 days post-injury, reconnecting the rostral and caudal stumps of the spinal cord. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis reveal sparse GAP-43 positive axons in the proximal stump, decreasing in the bridge, while neurofilament-labeled axons increase at 34 days and 3 months post-amputation in lizards with recovered hindlimb movements. The study concludes that limited axonal re-connection occurs 1–3 months post-injury, contributing to the activation of neural circuits that sustain the recovery of hind-limb movements after initial paralysis.

Practical Implications

Understanding Spinal Cord Regeneration

The study provides insights into the mechanisms of spinal cord regeneration in lizards, which may offer clues for promoting regeneration in mammals.

Potential Therapeutic Targets

Identifying key molecules and factors involved in the recovery process in lizards could lead to the development of therapeutic interventions for spinal cord injuries in humans.

Comparative Analysis

The comparative analysis of spinal cord regeneration in different species can help understand the evolutionary aspects of nerve regeneration and the reasons for its failure in endotherm amniotes.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Qualitative immunohistochemical observations
  • 2
    Limited number of animals used in some experimental groups
  • 3
    Lack of quantification of axonal regeneration in the bridge region

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury